
We brought you the scoop last month that Jerome Armstrong, legendary net roots campaigner from the US and author of a hugely influential book on the subject, had been signed up by Brian Paddick for his London Mayoral bid.
We now know that it didn’t do him much good but I thought it was interesting to look at what innovations were tried and which worked or didn’t.
The Lib Dem web supremo is Mark Pack and true to social media principles he was only too happy to share learnings….
Importance of emails - Data protection laws make it harder for UK campaigns to build up email lists and use them for different purposes, making it harder to achieve the micro-targeting used so successfully in the US. However where emails are sent, the readership rates are much higher than in the US. For the Paddick campaign they were several times higher.
Fundraising - Mark says the campaign was happy with what it raised online but we shouldn’t hold out too much hope for a Howard Dean-type avalanche of small donors to replace the oligarchs and tycoons. The culture in the UK is still to help your Party and to do it through delivering leaflets etc as opposed to donating money to a candidate.
Twitter - this caused a great deal of expectation and debate over whether this was being used as a gimmick. Mark’s view was ….
“Twitter has some way to go to reach the story of mass audience that Facebook has, but it’s a good way of having a more engaged relationship with people than many other online tools.
“The Twitter interview seem to work well, though next time round I think we wouldn’t try to bunch up the questions for a batch of replies, but rather say, here’s a period of time when X will be checking messages and answering regularly”
All views welcome. As you may know, I’m a Labour campaigner but happy to take my hat off to what Mark did here in the cause of helping politicians adapt to the new media and the way audiences want to interact.