<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Future#1 - Andrew Marr and a Nifty New TV Channel</title>
	<link>http://pr-media-blog.co.uk/media-future1-andrew-marr-and-a-nifty-new-tv-channel/</link>
	<description>A blog about the world of PR and New Media</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hanson</title>
		<link>http://pr-media-blog.co.uk/media-future1-andrew-marr-and-a-nifty-new-tv-channel/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pr-media-blog.co.uk/media-future1-andrew-marr-and-a-nifty-new-tv-channel/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>I agree, I think there's two phenomenon at work; one is the dispersal of news into thousands of publishers and we need a way of navigating all of that, some will need an editorial filter and some will be through peer recommendation; 

the other stuff is finding a level of debate where facts are reported but done so in detail without the constraints of an agressive headline, attacking someone and demanding a short-term solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I think there&#8217;s two phenomenon at work; one is the dispersal of news into thousands of publishers and we need a way of navigating all of that, some will need an editorial filter and some will be through peer recommendation; </p>
<p>the other stuff is finding a level of debate where facts are reported but done so in detail without the constraints of an agressive headline, attacking someone and demanding a short-term solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Bruce</title>
		<link>http://pr-media-blog.co.uk/media-future1-andrew-marr-and-a-nifty-new-tv-channel/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pr-media-blog.co.uk/media-future1-andrew-marr-and-a-nifty-new-tv-channel/#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Some excellent points by Marr especially when he says “I’m a great believer in the direct quote in quotation marks and the hard fact. In the blogging world there is a vast, swirling typhoon of comment, grandly called analysis..."

I couldn't agree more. However, and Marr refers to this as well, the problem for me is that more and more the mainstream media are producing (written and broadcast) comment and analysis of political news rather than actually reporting what is happening. I want to know what Cameron or Brown has said. Not what a reporter or commentator thinks of what he has said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some excellent points by Marr especially when he says “I’m a great believer in the direct quote in quotation marks and the hard fact. In the blogging world there is a vast, swirling typhoon of comment, grandly called analysis&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. However, and Marr refers to this as well, the problem for me is that more and more the mainstream media are producing (written and broadcast) comment and analysis of political news rather than actually reporting what is happening. I want to know what Cameron or Brown has said. Not what a reporter or commentator thinks of what he has said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
