Policy Exchange - It Was The PR’s Fault
Friday, September 26th, 2008 by Mark Hanson
A former boss of mine used to joke that top City finance houses would have an in-house press team and they would need to hire a PR agency so they could always have someone to blame whenever anything went wrong! I’ve been reminded of that many times in recent weeks when all the clever bankers seem to be running round in a mad panic as the financial system slowly melts around their ears.
It also jumped out at me this morning when I read an interview with the outgoing and incoming directors of trendy thinktank Policy Exchange in today’s Guardian. They’ve done some really interesting work over the last couple of years and have enjoyed a dizzy rise to prominence.
Full disclosure - I’ve done some work with Jesse Norman, senior fellow of the Policy Exchange over the last couple of years. I’ve also observed how the rise in popularity of the Cameron project and the revolving door between Policy Ex people and Tory HQ has boosted their media cache´.
But I think they were badly caught out by their release of a report last month that suggested entire swathes of the North of England should be closed down and the population moved to the home counties. A media package more toxic than the average sub-prime hedge fund.
It seems they were genuinely caught out by the media coverage being largely negative. They seemed shocked that the coverage was pretty selective and didn’t dig too deep into the fine detail?! Erm, yes, welcome to the British media:)
Even the Guardian and the Telegraph are writing for Mr and Mrs Average and need to pick a headline point with two supporting points. Add in two quotes, the more colourful the better and try and remember that your average middle englander neither wants to be forced out of York, Warrington or the Wirral or have bus loads of Mackems and Scousers arriving into newly built trailer parks in their back yards. So the press did what it does best - it frightened its readers!
Policy Ex also caught out here - forgetting that with prominence comes scrutiny.
Policy Ex are blaming it on the PR agency. They use InHouse PR , just like Boris ( a lot of Policy Ex’s people also went to work for Boris). If their agency didn’t voice its concerns strongly enough then it has learnt a powerful lesson in when to be brave in their client advice. But come on, this study was a ticking timebomb and everyone involved should have known the message, the product, was plain wrong.
Observers who attended the last Policy Ex Chrsitmas party remarked on how different it was to the year before. More corporates and hangers on, cheque books being flashed seductively and champagne flowing. May be they got a bit too giddy…….Labourhome is less charitable…..


